You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Tom IV zawiera orzecznictwo Sądu Najwyższego z lat 1922–2020 oraz piśmiennictwo z lat 1872–2020, dotyczące art. 506–757 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego lub zachowujące ścisły związek z jego przepisami. Na publikację składa się część bogatych zbiorów bibliograficznych autora, obejmujących prawie 100 000 pozycji. Liczy ona ok. 15 000 orzeczeń przypisanych do poszczególnych artykułów Kodeksu oraz tyleż pozycji piśmiennictwa. W zbiorze umieszczono wszystkie orzeczenia opublikowane – ze wskazaniem opracowanych do nich glos, notek, omówień lub komentarzy – niepublikowane natomiast tylko te, które autor uznał za ważne, istotne lub z innych powodów warte upowsze...
None
Winner of the Europe Book Prize One of Europe’s most preeminent investigative journalists travels to the Czech Republic—the Czech half of the former Czechoslovakia, the land that brought us Kafka—to explore the surreal fictions and the extraordinary reality of its twentieth century. For example, there’s the story of the small businessman who adopted Henry Ford’s ideas on productivity to create the world’s largest shoe company—and hired modernist giants such as Le Corbusier to design his company towns (which were also the birthplaces of Ivana Trump and Tom Stoppard). Or the story of Kafka’s niece, who loaned her name to writers blacklisted under the Communist regime so they co...
Prezentujemy Państwu kolejny tom Systemu Prawa Procesowego Cywilnego, który dotyczy postępowania cywilnego nieprocesowego. Na tom IV złożą się dwie części. Ze względu na obszerność poruszanych zagadnień część 1 została dodatkowo podzielona na dwa woluminy. img src= "https://static.profinfo.pl/file/core_files/2017/6/20/abb6a0de6f593344efcd8c3abe756249/Ico_Gray_17.gif" alt="Ico_Gray_17.gif [486 B]" width="40" Pod redakcją naukową Tadeusza Erecińskiego i Kazimierza Lubińskiego zostały omówione zagadnienia ogólne tego trybu postępowania cywilnego, odrębne w stosunku do regulacji procesowych. Z tych względów w tomie IV nie ma szerszej analizy takich zagadnień, jak zas...
Adam Michnik, one of Poland's foremost writers and intellectuals, and Agnieszka Marczyk gather together the definitive wisdom and discussion of Poland's complex history of anti-Semitism and its legacies.
Based on extensive original research, including interviews with key participants, this book investigates the sudden and unforeseen collapse of communist power in Poland in 1989. It sets out the sequence of events, and examines the strategies of the various political groupings prior to the partially free election of June 1989. This volume argues that the specific negotiating strategies adopted by the communist party representatives in the Round Table discussions before the elections was a key factor in communism’s collapse. The book shows that on many occasions, PZPR decision-makers ignored expert advice, and many Round Table bargains went against the party’s best interests. Using in-depth interviews with major party players, including General Jaruzelski, General Kiszczak and Mieczyslaw Rakowski, as well as Solidarity advisors such as Adam Michnik, the text provides a unique source of first-hand accounts of Poland’s revolutionary drama.
This book concerns building an idealized image of the society in which the Holocaust occurred. It inspects the category of the bystander (in Polish culture closely related to the witness), since the war recognized as the axis of self-presentation and majority politics of memory. The category is of performative character since it defines the roles of event participants, assumes passivity of the non-Jewish environment, and alienates the exterminated, thus making it impossible to speak about the bystanders’ violence at the border between the ghetto and the ‘Aryan’ side. Bystanders were neither passive nor distanced; rather, they participated and played important roles in Nazi plans. Start...
Mattelart unpacks the notion of the information society, and examines why it has become the dominant paradigm for social change. He also asks why the notion has come to be dominant in the absence of any critical examination of the conditions under which it has been produced.