Welcome to our book review site go-pdf.online!
You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
The Shroud at Court
The Shroud at the Court analyses, through various essays characterized by a multidisciplinary and diachronic perspective, the strict ties created between the Shroud and the Savoy court from the fifteenth to twentieth centuries. Presented as proof of the divine legitimacy of Savoy lineage, the Shroud (of which the Savoy dynasty came into possession in 1453, keeping it first in Chambéry and then from 1578 in Turin) was central to their propagandistic strategies. The court – its spaces, protagonists, and rituals – became the natural setting for a relationship reinforced over time through customs, ceremonies, and images intended to celebrate the excellence of the Savoy, both within their own state and in Europe’s “society of princes”. Contributors are Paola Caretta, Paolo Cornaglia, Paolo Cozzo, Davide De Franco, Bernard Dompnier, Laura Gaffuri, Pierangelo Gentile, Luisella Giachino, Andrea Merlotti, Frédéric Meyer, Andrea Nicolotti, Almudena Pérez de Tudela, Laurent Ripart, Alessandro Serra and Franca Varallo.
Theologia moralis
None
Sämmtliche Werke
None
El cuento en Murcia en el siglo XX y otros ensayos
Se reúnen en este volumen diversos trabajos que han sido publicados por el doctor Ramón Jiménez Madrid en revistas regionales y nacionales sobre autores murcianos y otros inéditos, especialmente sobre el cuento en Murcia en el siglo XX. A través de las páginas de este libro se pasa revista, especialmente en el campo narrativo, a lo que ha sido la literatura en Murcia durante el siglo XX y se proporcionan las primicias sobre lo que puede ser el futuro de una literatura enclavada en un ámbito reducido. El volumen finaliza con las aportaciones sobre la obra de Cela y de Juan Eduardo Zúñiga, dos de los narradores más importantes del espacio español de la postguerra
The Debate on Probable Opinions in the Scholastic Tradition
In The Debate on Probable Opinions in the Scholastic Tradition, Rudolf Schuessler portrays scholastic approaches to a qualified disagreement of opinions. The book outlines how scholastic regulations concerning the use of opinions changed in the early modern era, giving rise to an extensive debate on the moral and epistemological foundations of reasonable disagreements. The debate was fueled by probabilism and anti-probabilism in Catholic moral theology and thus also serves as a gateway to these doctrines. All developments are outlined in historical context, while special attention is paid to the evolution of scholastic notions of probability and their importance for the emergence of modern probability.
