You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
El presente libro busca tratar dos grupos de problemas: el primero es el problema del conocimiento de los hechos en el proceso y tiene una conexión directa con la Teoría de la Prueba. El segundo grupo de interrogantes se refiere a la determinación conceptual de los distintos tipos de hechos que pueden constituir objeto de la prueba (acciones, omisiones, relaciones causales, estados mentales, etc.), de manera que su conexión con una Teoría de la Prueba es más indirecta, pero no por ello, menos importante. Los artículos recogidos aquí son reflexiones sobre los dos grupos de problemas mencionados anteriormente, estando los dos primeros de ellos enfocados al primer problema referido, y l...
El presente libro busca tratar dos grupos de problemas: el primero es el problema del conocimiento de los hechos en el proceso y tiene una conexión directa con la Teoría de la Prueba. El segundo grupo de interrogantes se refiere a la determinación conceptual de los distintos tipos de hechos que pueden constituir objeto de la prueba (acciones, omisiones, relaciones causales, estados mentales, etc.), de manera que su conexión con una Teoría de la Prueba es más indirecta, pero no por ello, menos importante. Los artículos recogidos aquí son reflexiones sobre los dos grupos de problemas mencionados anteriormente, estando los dos primeros de ellos enfocados al primer problema referido, y l...
This book suggests answers, or at least presents conceptual tools for finding answers, to questions such as: What is an action, and what is an omission? Can actions be counted? What is the role of intention for the identification of actions? The author offers an original approach to the analysis of action. Written in a very accessible style, the book is of interest to lawyers, legal scientists and philosophers.
Legal statements are, according to the authors, the most basic elements of the law. Nevertheless they must be considered not only as the pieces of a puzzle, but also as the components of a dynamic and highly complex reality: the law of contemporary society. The book presents an analysis of the different types of legal statements (mandatory rules, principles, power-conferring rules, definitions, permissions, values and the rule of recognition) from a threeefold perspective, that is, considering their logical structure, their function in legal reasoning as reasons for action, and their connections with the interests and power relationships among the individuals and the social groups. The result is conceived as a first step in the building of a general theory of law designed not as an isolated discourse but as a decisive element for the dynamization of the legal culture.
Este libro está compuesto por una serie de trabajos que, de manera conjunta, proponen la necesidad de construir una Teoría de la Prueba judicial a partir de dos condiciones. En primer lugar, esta debe estar constituida desde los hechos y los problemas planteados por éstos, y no desde las normas, esto es, que no se limite a ver los problemas de prueba como problemas de interpretación de las normas jurídicas que regulen la actividad probatoria.
This book suggests answers, or at least presents conceptual tools for finding answers, to questions such as: What is an action, and what is an omission? Can actions be counted? What is the role of intention for the identification of actions? The author offers an original approach to the analysis of action. Written in a very accessible style, the book is of interest to lawyers, legal scientists and philosophers.
The book describes the main concepts of the correctness thesis. The second part presents a reconstruction of the claim to correctness in some classical legal theories. For instance, it explains the thesis that we can find two different references to claims in Kelsen ́s theory, therefore allusions to a kind of classifying and qualifying connections. About Fuller one can find the idea that he introduces not only a procedural moral claim but also a substantive one. With respect to Radbruch, the book holds the idea that the correctness thesis can be found in his theory since 1932. The third part considers some main objections against the claim to correctness especially that proposed by Joseph Raz and John Finnis among others.
Para comemorar a data histórica do Tribunal da Cidadania, lançamos em quatro volumes os livros “Os 35 anos do Superior Tribunal de Justiça”, obra coletiva na qual tive o privilégio de figurar como Coordenador-Geral, ao lado de membros referenciais do Tribunal da Cidadania: o Volume I - Direito Público, é coordenado pelo MINISTRO BENEDITO GONÇALVES, o Volume II – Direito Privado, coordenado pelo MINISTRO LUIS FELIPE SALOMÃO, o Volume III – Direito Penal, coordenado pelo MINISTRO ROGERIO SCHIETTI CRUZ e o Volume IV – Direito Processual, coordenado pelo MINISTRO SÉRGIO KUKINA. Também contribuíram para a organização e a execução do projeto André de Azevedo Machado, Brun...