You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Hoewel België geen probleemland is met betrekking tot onwettig politioneel geweldgebruik, doen er zich toch ook incidenten voor tijdens politionele interventies. Legitiem geweldgebruik is aan strikte voorwaarden onderworpen. Zowel de preventie als sanctionering van politioneel geweldsgebruik worden kritisch bestudeerd in relatie tot de nationale en internationale regelgeving, met eveneens aandacht voor de rol van externe, onafhankelijke controleorganen. Met de CPS Scriptieprijs bekroont het Centrum voor Politiestudies jaarlijks het beste Nederlandstalige eindwerk, dat een kritische en vernieuwende blik werpt op een onderwerp aangaande politie en samenleving.
From the mid-1990s onwards concerns regarding the exposure of children to harmful content in the increasingly digital media environment intensified. Soon thereafter policy makers across Europe realised that alternative regulatory instruments, such as self- and co-regulation, might be more appropriate than traditional legislation to address this matter of public interest. Taking the complex and delicate nature of protecting minors into account, this book provides an in-depth legal analysis of the alternative regulatory instruments that can be used to regulate content in the digital era, with particular attention to the protection of fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression, privacy and procedural guarantees, internal market regulation, competition rules, and implementation requirements.
The term 'margin of appreciation' has been used for some time to refer to the room for manoeuvre that the Strasbourg institutions are prepared to accord national authorities in fulfilling some of their principal obligations under the European Convention for Human Rights. This document proposes how the meaning of the term may be given greater clarity, coherence and consistency.
This insightful book considers how the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is faced with numerous challenges which emanate from authoritarian and populist tendencies arising across its member states. It argues that it is now time to reassess how the ECHR responds to such challenges to the protection of human rights in the light of its historical origins.