You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Poder constituyente a debate: perspectivas desde América Latina presenta diferentes perspectivas que ilustran diversos entendimientos sobre la manera como los procesos de cambio constitucional se construyen a partir de interacciones entre normas jurídicas, instituciones estatales, ideas jurídicas y políticas, procesos socio-económicos y actores sociales. Cada uno de los ensayos reunidos en estas páginas estructura su análisis desde perspectivas teóricas distintas: algunos ponen un mayor énfasis en los procesos políticos que explican los cambios constitucionales, otros se concentran en la forma como los actores institucionales juegan con ideas como la del poder constituyente y algun...
What is fascism and what is populism? What are their connections in history and theory, and how should we address their significant differences? What does it mean when pundits call Donald Trump a fascist, or label as populist politicians who span left and right such as Hugo Chávez, Juan Perón, Rodrigo Duterte, and Marine Le Pen? Federico Finchelstein, one of the leading scholars of fascist and populist ideologies, synthesizes their history in order to answer these questions and offer a thoughtful perspective on how we might apply the concepts today. While they belong to the same history and are often conflated, fascism and populism actually represent distinct political trajectories. Drawing on an expansive record of transnational fascism and postwar populist movements, Finchelstein gives us insightful new ways to think about the state of democracy and political culture on a global scale. This new edition includes an updated preface that brings the book up to date, midway through the Trump presidency and the election of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil.
This book analyzes how replacing democratic constitutions may contribute to the improvement or erosion of democratic principles and practices.
Introduction -- Populism : why and why now? -- Populism as mobilization and as a party -- Populist governments and their logic -- Populism and constitutionalism -- Alternatives to populism.
Esta obra ilustra las diversas aproximaciones que surgen de otras formas de acercarse al conocimiento, a la vez que pone el acento en que, hoy por hoy, existen otros problemas desde la dogmática y lo social, pues el derecho es dinámico y no estático. Por ello, se han empezado a utilizar cada vez más métodos de las ciencias sociales, incluso de otras disciplinas, que enriquecen los hallazgos científicos y sus resultados e impactan en la sociedad. El libro plantea una aproximación epistemológica a la investigación jurídica desde una perspectiva teórica, e ilustra y se acerca a la realidad por medio de casos, ejemplos y análisis comparativo.
Nesta obra, Federico Finchelstein sintetiza a história do fascismo e do populismo referindo as suas ligações na história e na teoria e como devemos abordar as diferenças mais significativas entre ambos, oferecendo ainda uma perspectiva ponderada de como podemos aplicar os conceitos atualmente. Embora pertençam à mesma história e sejam frequentemente confundidos, na verdade, fascismo e populismo evidenciam trajetórias políticas e históricas distintas. Com base numa história expansiva do fascismo transnacional e nos movimentos e regimes populistas do pós-guerra, Finchelstein oferece-nos novas formas perspicazes de refletir sobre o estado da democracia e da cultura política a uma escala global.
The Glorious Revolution and the Continuity of Law explores the relationship between law and revolution. Revolt - armed or not - is often viewed as the overthrow of legitimate rulers. Historical experience, however, shows that revolutions are frequently accompanied by the invocation rather than the repudiation of law. No example is clearer than that of the Glorious Revolution of 1688-89. At that time the unpopular but lawful Catholic king, James II, lost his throne and was replaced by his Protestant son-in-law and daughter, William of Orange and Mary, with James's attempt to recapture the throne thwarted at the Battle of the Boyne in Ireland. The revolutionaries had to negotiate two contradic...
Spurred by recent governmental transitions from dictatorships to democratic institutions, this highly original work argues that negotiated civil society-oriented transitions have an affinity for a distinctive method of constitution making_one that accomplishes the radical change of institutions through legal continuity. Arato presents a compelling argument that this is the preferred method for rapidly establishing viable democratic institutions, and he contrasts the negotiated model with radical revolutionary change. This exceptionally engaging work will be of interest to students and scholars of comparative politics, constitutional law, and East European studies, as well as to political scientists and sociologists.
None