You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Komentarz szczegółowo omawia rozwiązania prawne zawarte w ustawie z 19 sierpnia 1994 r. o ochronie zdrowia psychicznego, uwzględniając szeroką praktykę orzeczniczą sądów polskich i Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka, a także wypowiedzi doktryny. Wiele miejsca poświęcono m.in.: ochronie osób chorych i ich praw, zasadzie przymusowego leczenia, przyjęciu do szpitala psychiatrycznego lub do domu pomocy społecznej, postępowaniu przed sądem opiekuńczym i tajemnicy informacji o stanie zdrowia pacjenta oraz o postępowaniu leczniczym. Autorzy odpowiadają również na pytania wpływające od Policji i lekarzy do prawników izb lekarskich w sprawie stosowania środków przymusu. Książka przeznaczona jest dla przedstawicieli zawodów prawniczych: sędziów i prokuratorów oraz adwokatów i radców prawnych biorących udział w postępowaniach z udziałem osób z zaburzeniami psychicznymi lub ich dotyczących, a także pracowników naukowych zajmujących się komentowaną materią. Zainteresuje również lekarzy, w szczególności psychiatrów, psychologów klinicznych, seksuologów, oraz kierowników podmiotów leczniczych z zakresu psychiatrii.
This volume discusses EU criminal justice from three perspectives. The first concerns fundamental rights following the adoption of the directives that have progressively reinforced the cornerstone of procedural rights of suspects and defendants in national criminal proceedings in the EU member states so as to facilitate judicial cooperation. The second perspective relates to transnational criminal investigations and proceedings, which are seen as a cross section of the current state of judicial cooperation in the area of freedom, security and justice, with the related issues of efficiency, coordination, settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction, and guarantees. The third perspective concerns the development of a supranational justice system in the light of the recently established European Public Prosecutor’s Office, whose European judicial nature still coexists with strong national components.
None
None
This book explores the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), the creation of which was approved in the Regulation adopted by the Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Council on 12 October 2017. The EPPO will be an independent European prosecution office tasked with investigating and prosecuting those crimes defined in the recently adopted Regulation 2017/1371 on combating fraud against the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law. As such, it will be a new actor on the EU landscape, governed by the principle of loyal cooperation with the national prosecuting authorities. This work clarifies some of the challenges that member states will have to face when dealing with a supran...
This book in addition of being remarkable academic reading contributes, on the highest scholarly level, to the furthering of our understanding of performance of the EU institutions which is essential for practitioners and researchers in the midst of the institutional crisis. Dominik Vuleti , Croatian International Relations Review . . . an impressively detailed introduction to the institutions and committees that form the core frameworks of EU activities including the EU Parliament, the European Central Bank, and the effects of EU membership expansion. The Institutions of the Enlarged European Union is very strongly recommended as an addition to governmental and university library Internatio...
An independent and impartial judiciary is fundamental to the existence and operation of a liberal democracy. Focussing on Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States, this comparative 2011 study explores four major issues affecting the judicial institution. These issues relate to the appointment and discipline of judges; judges and freedom of speech; the performance of non-judicial functions by judges; and judicial bias and recusal, and each is set within the context of the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. The essays highlight important episodes or controversies affecting members of the judiciary to illustrate relevant principles.