Welcome to our book review site go-pdf.online!
You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Judicial Bricolage
None
The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges
In 2007 the International Association of Constitutional Law established an Interest Group on 'The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges' to conduct a survey of the use of foreign precedents by Supreme and Constitutional Courts in deciding constitutional cases. Its purpose was to determine - through empirical analysis employing both quantitative and qualitative indicators - the extent to which foreign case law is cited. The survey aimed to test the reliability of studies describing and reporting instances of transjudicial communication between Courts. The research also provides useful insights into the extent to which a progressive constitutional convergence may be taking place b...
Marie-Claire Alain Collection
Collection contains program file.
Crítica del derecho (público) comparado
El uso del Derecho extranjero y la comparación jurídica son fenómenos cada vez con mayor relevancia, lo cual requiere cuestionarse: ¿Cómo se define el parámetro para delimitar qué es lo igual y lo diferente al momento de comparar? ¿Cuáles son los supuestos subyacentes a estos ejercicios? ¿Qué es lo que realmente se hace cuando se elaboran estudios jurídicos comparados? ¿Se pretende mostrar innovación, bagaje cultural y conocimientos jurídicos más allá de la frontera nacional? O bien, ¿hay, en la práctica, una introducción silenciosa, pero no azarosa, de dispositivos jerarquizadores de dominio e influencia con fines de uniformidad y estandarización que se disfrazan bajo l...
Constitutional Courts
Constitutional courts: forms, functions and practice in comparative perspective Andrew Harding, Peter Leyland and Tania Groppi -- Austria: the constitutional court of Austria: modern profiles of an archetype of constitutional review Anna Gamber and Francesco Palermo -- Central and Eastern Europe: constitutional courts of Central and Eastern Europe: between adolescence and maturity Kasia Lach and Wojchiech Sadurski -- France: The French Conseil constitutionnel: an evolving form of constitutional justice Marie Claire Ponthoreau and Fabrice Hourquebie -- Germany: Das Bundsverfassungsgericht: procedure, practice and policy of the German federal constitutional court Donald P Kommers and Russel A ...
The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication
In this book Bosko Tripkovic develops a theory of value-based arguments in constitutional adjudication. In contrast to the standard question of constitutional theory that asks whether the courts get moral answers wrong, it asks a more fundamental question of whether the courts get the morality itself wrong. Tripkovic argues for an antirealist conception of value -one that does not presuppose the existence of mind-independent moral truths- and accounts for the effect this ought to have on existing value-based arguments made by constitutional courts. The book identifies three dominant types of value-based arguments in comparative constitutional practice: arguments from constitutional identity,...
Comparative Judicial Review
Constitutional courts around the world play an increasingly central role in day-to-day democratic governance. Yet scholars have only recently begun to develop the interdisciplinary analysis needed to understand this shift in the relationship of constitutional law to politics. This edited volume brings together the leading scholars of constitutional law and politics to provide a comprehensive overview of judicial review, covering theories of its creation, mechanisms of its constraint, and its comparative applications, including theories of interpretation and doctrinal developments. This book serves as a single point of entry for legal scholars and practitioners interested in understanding the field of comparative judicial review in its broader political and social context.
Methods and Legal Comparison
This comprehensive book explores different methods and approaches to legal comparison, considering how they are perceived and understood by the reader. It examines how comparative discussion can be used effectively in both the classroom and courtroom. The author builds on both analytical and methodological perspectives to provide an insight into the phenomenon of legal pluralism across global legal systems.
