Welcome to our book review site go-pdf.online!
You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
A Real Mind
This comprehensive presentation of Axel Hägerström (1868-1939) fills a void in nearly a century of literature, providing both the legal and political scholar and the non-expert reader with a proper introduction to the father of Scandinavian realism. Based on his complete work, including unpublished material and personal correspondence selected exclusively from the Uppsala archives, A Real Mind follows the chronological evolution of Hägerström’s intellectual enterprise and offers a full account of his thought. The book summarizes Hägerström’s main arguments while enabling further critical assessment, and tries to answer such questions as: If norms are neither true nor false, how can...
International justice and interpretation
The 2001 issue of the Yearbook deals with the problem of international justice. What is the meaning of "justice" in the age of globalisation? In which sense can the "right" provide for criteria that make it possible to afford conflicts in international relations? Which new interpretative standards do turn out to be introduced within domestic law by international dimension? This issue of Ars interpretandi tries to answer these questions as well as other ones, according to an interdisciplinary view, which examine their implications in law, ethics, politics, economics and religion.
Abuse of Rights
The book is an adaptation of part of the author's PhD thesis, which won the international prize Prémio FIBE, and was voted one of the three best in Brazil, in the field of Law, in 2023. It deals with the history of the notion of abuse of rights, in its two traditions: the Franco-Belgian (abus de droit) and the German (unzulässige Rechtsausübung). It also presents the discourse of abuse of rights with a 'shortcut' function. Finally, it places the scientific formulation of groups of cases as necessary for the proper use of the abuse of rights discourse. Fabio Carvalho de Alvarenga Peixoto PhD in Constitutional Law (Universidade de Fortaleza - Brazil). State Attorney. Private lawyer. Winner ...
Ars Interpretandi / Vol.5
" The 2000 issue of the Yearbook deals with the concept of translation. From the perspectives of philosophy of language, theology, comparative law and jurisprudence, such a notion is here addressed both in itself and in its many-sided relationships with the concept of interpretation. Schwerpunkt von Ars Interpretandi 2000 ist das Problem der Ubersetzung. Aus den Perspektiven von Sprachphilosophie, Theologie, Vergleichsrecht und Rechtstheorie wird dieser Begriff sowohl in sich selbst als auch in seinen mehrseitigen Zusammenhang mit Auslegung untersucht. Mit Beitr gen von: /Contributors: Giovanna Borradori; Donald Davidson; Gerard Rene de Groot; Winfried Hassemer; Domenico Jervolino; Tecia Mazzarese; Gianfranco Ravasi; Paul Ricoeur; Rodolfo Sacco; John R. Searle; Michael Walzer; Jerzy Wroblewski "
Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America
This ground-breaking collection of essays outlines and explains the unique development of Latin American jurisprudence. It introduces the idea of the Ius Constitutionale Commune en America Latina (ICCAL), an original Latin American path of transformative constitutionalism, to an Anglophone audience for the first time. It charts the key developments that have transformed the region and assesses the success of the constitutional projects that followed a period of authoritarian regimes in Latin America. Coined by scholars who have been documenting, conceptualizing, and comparing the development of Latin American public law for more than a decade, the term ICCAL encompasses themes that cross nat...
Groups, Rules and Legal Practice
Ever since Hart ́s The Concept of Law, legal philosophers agree that the practice of law-applying officials is a fundamental aspect of law. Yet there is a huge disagreement on the nature of this practice. Is it a conventional practice? Is it like the practice that takes place, more generally, when there is a social rule in a group? Does it share the nature of collective intentional action? The book explores the main responses to these questions, and claims that they fail on two main counts: current theories do not explain officials ́ beliefs that they are under a duty qua members of an institution, and they do not explain officials ́ disagreement about the content of these institutional duties. Based on a particular theory of collective action, the author elaborates then an account of certain institutions, and claims that the practice is an institutional practice of sorts. This would explain officials ́ beliefs in institutional duties, and officials ́ disagreement about those duties. The book should be of interest to legal philosophers, but also to those concerned with group and social action theories and, more generally, with the nature of institutions.
Proceedings of the 21st IVR World Congress, Lund, Sweden, 12-17 August, 2003: Justice
Selected Articles B. McLachlin: Imagining the Other: Legal Rights and Diversity in the Modern World A. R. Bernstein: Rawls' Law of Peoples on Just War, Human Rights and Toleration C. Brown: Decent Peoples, Outlaw States, Burdened Societies Kok-chor Tan: Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism in The Law of Peoples A. Macleod: Rawls on Human Rights D. A. Reidy: Rawls on Global Economic Justice I. Trujillo: How Can the International Duty of Assistance Be Justified F. J. Blazques Ruiz: Derechos humanos, Globalizacion, Migraciones J. A Baker: The Conceptual Geography of Restorative Justice H. Khatchadourian: Compensation & Reparation as Forms of Compensatory Justice R. Madrid: Deconstruction and Universality of Law B. Bravo Lira: Fortdauer und Problematik des Rechtsstaats in Iberoamerika R. Tamayo: Rights, Distribution, and Access to Justice I. B. Flores: Assessing Democracy and Rule of Law: Access to Justice R. Vazquez: On Equality and Education S. Morimura: The Nature of Obligation to Future Generations F. Fernandez-Creuhet Lopez: Good Practice: a Critical View M. J. Falcon y Tella: The Presumption of Innocence and Civil Disobedience C. B. Gray: Two Visions of Equality a.o.
The Concept of Rights
What does it mean to have a right? Previous answers to this question fall into two groups: interest/benefit theories of rights and choice/will theories. This book proposes an alternative to these traditional views: the justified-constraint theory of rights, which avoids the pitfalls of earlier theories, and solves the puzzle of the relational nature of rights. The analysis shows that this theory applies without modification to past, present and future beings.
DiaLaw
This book is a revised version of my dissertation 'DiaLaw - on legal th justification and dialog games' that I defended on June 5 1998 at the Universiteit Maastricht. The chapters 1, 4 & 5 (now: 1, 5 & 6) of my dissertation have remained largely unaltered. In chapter 2 I added explicitly the distinction between constructing legal justification and reconstructing it, and tried to elucidate the differences (and similarities) between the product and process of justification. Chapter 3 is divided into two chapters: one on the general characteristics of DiaLaw (now: chapter 3), and the other on specific, legal characteristics of DiaLaw (now: chapter 4). In order to improve readability, all rules ...
Legal Reductionism and Freedom
Martin van Hees presents a new approach to the study of law - legal reductionism - which combines elements of legal positivism, new institutionalism and decision theory. From legal positivism Van Hees derives some fundamental insights into the nature of legal systems, but he also revises some of its key tenets. He argues that law can be reduced to facts; moreover, he re-establishes the relation between law and morality by arguing that law and positive morality are inherently related. He subsequently uses decision-theoretic tools to develop and defend his reductionist methodology. The second part of the study applies the resulting approach to an analysis of legal freedom. By showing that legal reductionism allows us to analyse the value of liberal legal systems, Van Hees makes a forceful case for including the study of law in moral and political philosophy. The book is accessible to a wide readership, including legal and moral philosophers, political theorists and social scientists.
