You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
'Son of Man' is practically the only self-designation employed by Jesus himself in the gospels, but is used in such a way that no hint is left of any particular theological significance. Still, during the first many centuries of the church, the expression as it was reused was given content, first literally as signifying Christ's human nature. Later 'Son of Man' was thought to be a christological title in its own right. Today, many scholars are inclined to think that, in an original Aramaic of an historical Jesus, it was little more than a rhetorical circumlocution, referring to the one speaking. Mogens Müller's 'The Expression 'Son of Man' and the Development of Christology: A History of Interpretation' is the first study of the 'Son of Man' trope, which traces the history of interpretation from the Apostolic Fathers to the present, concluding that the various interpretations of this phrase reflect little more than the various doctrinal assumptions held by its interpreters over centuries.
Distinguished in the field of Enochic studies, Gabriele Boccaccini led the way in June 2005 at the Third Enoch Seminar, entirely devoted to the Book of Parables in light of Second Temple Judaism and Christian origins. The unusual and compelling collection of essays found here reflects the spirit of sharing and dialogue that has made these seminars so popular and intriguing to scholars throughout the world.This third collection of essays from these historic meetings contains the observations and contemplations of forty-four scholars, includes a helpful introduction by Boccaccini detailing the history of the movement, and ends with likely prospects for future research and an extensive bibliography compiled by associate editor Jason von Ehrenkrook for further study.Enoch and the Messiah Son of Man will be a significant contribution for the understanding and discussion of ancient Judaism.
None
None
Originaire d'Amboise et de Blois, Pierre-Jacques Orillard de Villemanzy, jeune commissaire des guerres de l'armée Rochambeau en Amérique, se retrouve commissaire général de l'armée du Rhin sous la Révolution. Prisonnier de l'Autriche, le Directoire le récupère et le désigne ordonnateur en chef de l'armée d'Italie auprès de Bonaparte. Puis ce sera l'inspection générale, le camp de Boulogne, la Grande Armée, où il succède à Petiet comme intendant général. Sa carrière mouvementée se poursuit, toujours comme intendant général, aux armées du Rhin et d'Allemagne, conjointement à l'administration des Territoires conquis, puis des pays entre l'Elbe et l'Oder. Entre temps, il...
None
Cet ouvrage est une réédition numérique d’un livre paru au XXe siècle, désormais indisponible dans son format d’origine.