You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
La presente obra colectiva –dirigida por la Catedrática de Derecho Procesal de la Universidad de León, la Dra. Piedad González Granda- pone su empeño en contribuir a desentrañar una de las temáticas más complejas en la actualidad, dada la confluencia en su ámbito de tres parámetros a su vez en constante construcción y evolución. En primer lugar, el alcance de las exclusiones probatorias, es decir, de los efectos de la llamara Prueba Prohibida; en segundo lugar, el entorno digital, es decir, el entorno de la Prueba digital como especialidad –en sentido amplio- de la prueba; y en tercer y último lugar, el ámbito de los poderes del Juez y de las parte en los actos probatorios, ...
Contenido del libro: Prueba judicial: 1. El deber de revelar secretos en el juicio civil. Los límites a la exhibición documental de terceros como ejemplo de un problema dogmático, Thomas Vogt Geisse. 2. Sobre la teoría del caso y las cuestiones probatorias a partir del Código Procesal Penal del año 2000, Jorge Larroucau Torres. 3. Prueba científica: navegando entre Escila y Caribdis. Propuestas para una mejor comprensión de la prueba científica, Andrés Fuchs Nissim - Diego Hernández De Lamotte. Derecho procesal comparado: 4. Tiempo para juzgar: soluciones a la sobrecarga de la Corte Suprema chilena desde una perspectiva económica, Pablo Bravo-Hurtado. 5. El case management en el ...
"Durante varios años se ha venido generando la mutación en el tránsito de la prueba de “posiciones juradas” hacia la “declaración de parte” (sin juramento), aun cuando en algunas legislaciones se mantiene aquella prueba y en otras la pervivencia de ambos sistemas en paralelo probatorio; mientras que en otros la sustitución de las posiciones por el interrogatorio de parte sin juramento es total. Y esta metamorfosis, especialmente legislativa por influencia de la doctrina, encuentra sentido en la posible diferencia esencial entre uno y otro medio de prueba. Por eso, ¿cuál es la diferencia esencial que existe entre las posiciones y la declaración de parte, de modo que uno de est...
This collection contains studies on justice, juridical reasoning and argumenta tion which contributed to my ideas on the new rhetoric. My reflections on justice, from 1944 to the present day, have given rise to various studies. The ftrst of these was published in English as The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1963). The others, of which several are out of print or have never previously been published, are reunited in the present volume. As justice is, for me, the prime example of a "confused notion", of a notion which, like many philosophical concepts, cannot be reduced to clarity without being distorted, one cannot treat it without recourse to th...
This extensively revised second edition covers the basic concepts and principles underlying the logic of proof; the uses and dangers of story-telling; probabilities and proof; the chart method and other methods of analyzing and ordering evidence. They are utilized in fact-investigation, preparing for trial, and in connection with other important decisions in legal processes and criminal investigation and intelligence analysis. Most of the chapters in the new edition have been rewritten; the treatment of fact investigation, probabilities and narrative has been extended; and new examples and exercises have been added.
Provides a thematically integrated analysis and discussion of neuroethical questions about memory capacity, content, and interventions.
This is a book about the law's failure as a system of empirical inquiry. While the US Supreme Court repeatedly says that the aim of a trial is to find out the truth about a crime, there is abundant evidence that many of the rules of evidence and legal procedure are not truth-conducive. Quite the contrary; many are truth-thwarting. Relevant evidence of defendant's guilt is often excluded; reasonable inferences from the available evidence are likewise often excluded. When a defendant elects not to testify, jurors are told to draw no inculpatory inferences from the former's refusal to be questioned. If evidence of prior crimes committed by the defendant is admitted (and often it is excluded), j...
Our memories, many believe, make us who we are. But most of our experiences have been forgotten, and the memories that remain are often wildly inaccurate. How, then, can memories play this person-making role? The answer lies in a largely unrecognized type of memory: Rilkean memory.
By shedding light on the many factors that can intervene and create inaccurate testimony, Elizabeth Loftus illustrates how memory can be radically altered by the way an eyewitness is questioned, and how new memories can be implanted and old ones changed in subtle ways.