Welcome to our book review site go-pdf.online!
You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Regulatory Rights
We often hear—with particular frequency during recent Supreme Court nomination hearings—that justices should not create constitutional rights, but should instead enforce the rights that the Constitution enshrines. In Regulatory Rights, Larry Yackle sets out to convince readers that such arguments fundamentally misconceive both the work that justices do and the character of the American Constitution in whose name they do it. It matters who sits on the Supreme Court, he argues, precisely because justices do create individual constitutional rights. Traversing a wide range of Supreme Court decisions that established crucial precedents about racial discrimination, the death penalty, and sexual freedom, Yackle contends that the rights we enjoy are neither more nor less than what the justices choose to make of them. Regulatory Rights is a bracing read that will be heatedly debated by all those interested in constitutional law and the judiciary.
Reclaiming the Federal Courts
Go ahead and try to make a federal case of it. That may seem to be your right, but as Yackle reveals, the guardians of that right don't see it that way. A systematic study of the role the federal courts play in enforcing the Constitution, this book shows how the current Supreme Court has undermined that role by restricting citizens' access.
Federal Courts
This book identifies and explores the major problems now under discussion in law school courses typically denominated "Federal Courts" or "Federal Jurisdiction." It anticipates the questions that law faculty are likely to raise in class and gives students a head start in building satisfying responses. This book also functions as an update of Professor Yackle's previous book, entitled Federal Courts. The third edition of that book appeared in 2009.
Federalism
Federalism is one of the most influential concepts in modern political discourse as well as the focus of immense controversy resulting from the lack of a single coherent definition. Malcolm M. Feeley and Edward Rubin expose the ambiguities of modern federalism, offering a powerful but generous treatise on the modern salience of the term. “Malcolm Feeley and Edward Rubin have published an excellent book.” —Sanford Levinson, University of Texas at Austin “At last, an insightful examination of federalism stripped of its romance. An absolutely splendid book, rigorous but still accessible.” —Larry Yackle, Boston University “Professors Feeley and Rubin clearly define what is and is n...
Habeas Corpus Issues
None
Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State
Investigates the role of federal judges in prison reform, and policy making in general.
