Welcome to our book review site go-pdf.online!
You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Readings in Trial Advocacy and the Social Sciences
Within the past 25 years, social scientists have applied the basic techniques of the social sciences to the study of jury trials and their outcomes, while legal research itself has frequently addressed the jury trial process. This four-volume collection brings together over 100 of the most significant articles from some 50 journals in psychology, sociology, and speech communication, as well as law and criminal justice, to meet the needs of scholars, students, attorneys, and others interested in the jury trial process. The volumes match the phases of a jury trial: V.1: Juries: Formation and Behavior (1419- 1); V.2: Opening Statement, Closing Argument, and Persuasion in Trial Advocacy (1420-5); V3: Presentation of Evidence to Juries (1421-3); and V4: Instructions, Verdicts, and Judicial Behavior (1422-1). Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Juries: Formation & Behavior
First Published in 1993. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
Instructions, Verdicts, and Judicial Behavior
First Published in 1994. Volume 4 in the 4-volume anthology of scholarly articles titled Readings in Trial Advocacy and the Social Sciences; a series seeking to increase our understanding of courtroom dynamics. This fourth volume consists of six jury instructions, six verdicts and two articles on judicial behaviour. These collection raises issues ranging from ability of jurors to understand judicial instructions to the ability of attorneys to predict the outcome of pending litigation.
Juries
First Published in 1993. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
Eligible for Execution
This riveting and enlightening narrative unfolds on the night of August 16, 1996, with the brutal and senseless murder of Eric Nesbitt, a young man stationed at Langley Air Force Base, at the hands of 18-year-old Daryl Atkins. Over the course of more than a decade, Atkins’s case has bounced between the lowest and the highest levels of the judicial system. Found guilty and then sentenced to death in 1998 for Nesbitt’s murder, the Atkins case was then taken up in 2002 by the U.S. Supreme Court. The issue before the justices: given Daryl Atkins’s mental retardation, would his execution constitute cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth Amendment? A 6–3 vote said yes. Da...
Recent Acquisitions
None
Current Law Index
None
