You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Proceedings of a workshop on Seismic Performance and Simulation of Pile Foundations in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground, held in Davis, California, March 16-18, 2005. Sponsored by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; University of California at Berkeley; Center for Urban Earthquake Engineering; Tokyo Institute of Technology; Geo-Institute of ASCE. This collection contains 25 papers that discuss physical measurements and observations from earthquake case histories, field tests in blast-liquefied ground, dynamic centrifuge model studies, and large-scale shaking table studies. Papers contain recent findings on fundamental soil-pile interaction mechanisms, numerical analysis methods, and reviews and evaluations of existing and emerging design methodologies. This proceeding provides comprehensive coverage of a major issue in earthquake engineering practice and hazard mitigation efforts.
None
Vols. 29-30 contain papers of the International Engineering Congress, Chicago, 1893; v. 54, pts. A-F, papers of the International Engineering Congress, St. Louis, 1904.
Approach fills behind bridge abutments are commonly supported by wrap-around mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls; however the effect of this geometry on passive force development is unknown. This report describes the first large-scale tests to evaluate passive force-deflection curves for abutments with MSE wingwalls. A test was also performed with fill extending beyond the edge of the abutment wall for comparison. The abutment wall was simulated with a pile supported cap 5.5 ft high, 11 ft wide, and 15 ft long in the direction of loading. The backfill behind the pile cap consisted of clean sand compacted to 96% of the modified Proctor maximum density. As the pile cap was loaded lateral...
This study investigated the increase in passive force produced by compacting a dense granular fill adjacent to a pile cap or abutment wall when the surrounding soil is in a relative loose state. Lateral load tests were performed on a pile cap with three backfills to evaluate the static and dynamic behavior. One backfill consisted of loose silty sand while the other two consisted of dense gravel zones 3 ft. (0.91 m) and 6 ft. (1.82 m) wide between the pile cap and the loose silty sand. The 3 ft. and 6 ft. wide dense gravel zones increased the lateral resistance by 75% to 150% and 150% to 225%, respectively, relative to the loose silty sand backfill. Despite being thin relative to the overall ...