You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Adriana Cavarero has been, and continues to be, one of the most innovative and influential voices in Italian political and feminist thought of the last forty years. Known widely for her challenges to the male-dominated canon of political philosophy (and philosophy more broadly construed), Cavarero has offered provocative accounts of what constitutes the political, with an emphasis on embodiment, singularity, and relationality. Political Bodies gathers some of today’s most prominent and well-established theorists, along with emerging scholars, to contribute their insights, questions, and concerns about Cavarero's political philosophy and to put her work in conversation with other feminist thinkers, political theorists, queer theorists, and thinkers of race and coloniality. A new essay by Adriana Cavarero herself closes out the volume. Political Bodies ventures beyond the familiar boundaries of Cavarero's own writing and is a testament to the generative encounters that her philosophy makes possible.
What remains of materialism’s subversive potential — i.e., its ties with heresy or atheism and republicanism or communism — and to what extent does this concept still interpellate us politically and philosophically? As neoliberal policies expanded far beyond the state, their mechanisms of control seeped into the materiality of social reproduction, solidifying a conception of matter as something inert, to be appropriated, manipulated, and exploited. If in this context the subversive nature of a reference to materiality is called into question, it has also provoked new forms of resistance, as well as fundamental reconsiderations of the political implications of the notion of ‘matter’...
Ayse enin Uzaklar daki Malaya Macerasi - 5 yasindaki cocuklar ve cocuk oldugunu unutmayan yetiskinler icin.
Intellektuelle gibt es in den Gesellschaften Europas seit dem Mittelalter und bis heute. Sie sind gelehrte Experten und zugleich kritische Begleiter des Zeitgeschehens, gehören zur Wissenskultur der Universitäten und sind als kritische Köpfe eigenständige, oft unangepasste Denker, die als Mahner und Kritiker häufig gefragt und zitiert wurden, aber stets auch auf Widerspruch trafen. Die elf Beiträge dieses Bandes stellen die Rolle der Intellektuellen vom Mittelalter bis zur heutigen Zeit dar. Enthalten sind Texte von Michael Busch, Caspar Hirschi, Martin Kintzinger, Hans-Uwe Lammel, Zdeněk Nebřenský, Meta Niederkorn-Bruck, Pietro Daniel Omodeo, Jürgen Renn, Frank Rexroth, Pauline Spychala, Lars Tschirschwitz und Isabella von Treskow.
En matière d’histoire littéraire et philosophique, le XIXe siècle a tout d’une période matricielle, bien qu’il soit encore trop peu envisagé comme tel. S’interroger sur les mémoires du XIXe siècle, c’est d’abord tenter de discerner, de nommer ce qui, dans nos propres pratiques, date de cette époque; c’est essayer d’objectiver ce qui nous a été transmis et que nous avons endossé, validé, reconduit, sans toujours l’avoir consciemment formulé. Les controverses qui agitent cette période ont en effet contribué à percer les boulevards mémoriels que nous arpentons encore aujourd’hui, et sans doute n’ont-elles pas joué un rôle moins structurant dans certains phénomènes d’amnésie dont nous ne sommes peut-être pas guéris. De ce fait, les conflits mémoriels et historiographiques du XIXe siècle ne concernent pas les seuls spécialistes du XIXe siècle. Leur analyse constitue l’indispensable étape d’une généalogie critique de nos propres façons d’écrire l’histoire de la littérature et de la philosophie.
There can be little doubt that without Spinoza, German Idealism would have been just as impossible as it would have been without Kant. Yet the precise nature of Spinoza's influence on the German Idealists has hardly been studied in detail. This volume of essays by leading scholars sheds light on how the appropriation of Spinoza by Fichte, Schelling and Hegel grew out of the reception of his philosophy by, among others, Lessing, Mendelssohn, Jacobi, Herder, Goethe, Schleiermacher, Maimon and, of course, Kant. The volume thus not only illuminates the history of Spinoza's thought, but also initiates a genuine philosophical dialogue between the ideas of Spinoza and those of the German Idealists. The issues at stake - the value of humanity; the possibility and importance of self-negation; the nature and value of reason and imagination; human freedom; teleology; intuitive knowledge; the nature of God - remain of the highest philosophical importance today.
Youth Work in the Commonwealth: A Growth Profession establishes a baseline to inform the planning and implementation of initiatives to professionalise youth work in Commonwealth member countries. The study was conducted in 35 countries in the Africa, Asia, the Caribbean/Americas, Europe and Pacific regions. It catalogues the extent to which the youth work profession is formally recognised in these countries and examines the qualities and rights-based ethos of the various forms of youth work promoted and practised in the Commonwealth. The report aims to help countries learn from good practices, and assess gaps in establishing youth work as a recognised profession in diverse contexts.
This volume brings together a series of cutting-edge studies on significant controversies and prize essay contests of the German Enlightenment. It sheds new light on the nature and impact of the philosophical debates of the period, while analyzing a range of pressing philosophical questions. In doing so, it focuses on controversies and prize competitions as conditions for the advancement of knowledge and the staking out of new philosophical terrain. Chapters address not only the rich content of the questions but also their wider context, including the theoretical framework of the debates and their institutional support and aims. Together they demonstrate how these debates created a rallying ...
This volume explores the relationship between physics and metaphysics in Descartes’ philosophy. According to the standard account, Descartes modified the objects of metaphysics and physics and inverted the order in which these two disciplines were traditionally studied. This book challenges the standard account in which Descartes prioritizes metaphysics over physics. It does so by taking into consideration the historical reception of Descartes and the ways in which Descartes himself reacted to these receptions in his own lifetime. The book stresses the diversity of these receptions by taking into account not only Cartesianisms but also anti-Cartesianisms, and by showing how they retroactively highlighted different aspects of Descartes’ works and theoretical choices. The historical aspect of the volume is unique in that it not only analyzes different constructions of Descartes that emerged in the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries, but also reflects on how his work was first read by philosophers across Europe. Taken together, the essays in this volume offer a fresh and up-to-date contribution to this important debate in early modern philosophy.