You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Reprint of the original, first published in 1858. The publishing house Anatiposi publishes historical books as reprints. Due to their age, these books may have missing pages or inferior quality. Our aim is to preserve these books and make them available to the public so that they do not get lost.
The events portrayed in The Diary of a Gatekeeper are somewhat other worldly, almost unreal. The question we should ask is not if what is recounted in these pages real, but what do we consider real and unreal? The vulnerable yet indomitable Anya is assailed from all angles from a veritable gamut of dark forces that she can barely comprehend. Some were externally generated and some came from within. She struggled to cope and, in a near state of despair, she stumbled upon someone who could help. Of course, Anya did not find Mark by chance. In the grand design of the universe, all proceeded in karmic synchronicity. Mark and Anya are sent demons, werewolves, and disincarnate earth-bound spirits of all kinds to face. Mark Ash becomes the equilibrium and the force for good against the rising tide of evil. This is his story. What unfolds is his learning. All must be in balance. All must be equal; light and dark, dark and light. The ebb and flow never ceases; the story never ends.
The traditional theory of urban finance argues against local redistribution of wealth on the assumption that such action is likely to chase away the relatively wealthy, leaving only the impoverished behind. Nevertheless, Clayton P. Gillette observes, local governments engage in substantial redistribution, both to the wealthy and to the poor. In this thoughtful book, Gillette examines whether recent campaigns to enact "living wage" ordinances and other local redistributive programs represent gaps in the traditional theory or political opportunism. He then investigates the role of the courts in distinguishing between these explanations. The author argues that courts have greater capacity to review local programs than is typically assumed. He concludes that when a single interest group dominates the political process, judicial intervention to determine a program's legal validity may be appropriate. But if the political contest involves competing groups, courts should defer to local political judgments.
A collection of practical tips from prominent family lawyers offering a wealth of advice and proven techniques to enhance the family law practice.