You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
The Political Accountability of EU and US Independent Regulatory Agencies is an in-depth investigation on the law and practices of the political accountability arrangements of the 35 EU and 16 US independent agencies. The comparative analysis demonstrates similarities between the political accountability arsenals and challenges to political oversight in the EU and the US. The greatest differences are revealed in the organization of the political accountability of independent agencies, i.e., ‘excessive diversity in the EU vs. uniformity in the US’, and the design of accountability obligations. Based on comparative insights, the book concludes with three recommendations on how the EU agencies’ political accountability could be adjusted in the ongoing reform on agencies’ creation and operation.
Considers. H.R. 4800 and related H.R. 6774, to amend the Communications Act, the Federal Aviation Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Federal Power Act, the Interstate Commerce Act, and the Securities Exchange Act to increase regulatory agencies power and independence of action. S. 1735, to amend the Communications Act to repeal the honorarium provision regarding presentation or delivery of publications to the FCC. S. 1736, to amend the Communications Act to eliminate required oath or affirmation on certain documents filed with FCC. S. 1738, to amend the Communications Act to lessen functions of FCC review staff. S. 1965, to amend the Federal Power Act to readjust succession and appointment policies for Commissioners of regulatory agencies. Includes "Problems of the CAB and the Independent Regulatory Commissions" by Louis J. Hector, Sept. 10, 1959 (p. 336-411); and CAB "Comments on the Hector Memorandum" (p. 412-507)
A critical examination of the role of the independent regulatory commissions, attempting to develop a more realistic concept of the process of governmental regulation and to appraise the independent commission as an agent of governmental regulation at the national level. Originally published in 1955. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
The Unwieldy American State examines controversies over federal administrative law in the 1940s and 1950s. The seemingly arcane procedures used by federal administrative agencies to make rules, draft policies, and issue orders were a major political issue in the years following World War II, as politicians and lawyers tried to shape rules according to their own political preferences. Reforms changed both administrative operations and the public discussion surrounding them and made the administrative state more difficult to attack.
Public regulation of site-selection for nuclear power plants is woven into the fabric of the distinctively-American experience in exercising government control over privately-owned public utilities. Originally published in 1977, the authors have identified the various dimensions of public concern with the selection of new nuclear power sites. This volume, divided into four parts, explores the complex issues at the heart of American nuclear power: Part I contains literature which describes the process of power-plant siting as conducted by the utilities; Part II contains studies and reports on the structure and process of public regulation; Part III describes local government, State, and other Federal agency regulation of siting; and finally, Part IV cites selected proposals and analyses of recommendations for regulatory reform. This is a valuable resource for any student interested in environmental studies and public policy reform.