Welcome to our book review site go-pdf.online!
You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
A Fortiori Logic
A FORTIORI LOGIC: INNOVATIONS, HISTORY AND ASSESSMENTS, by Avi Sion, is a wide-ranging and in-depth study of a fortiori reasoning, comprising a great many new theoretical insights into such argument, a history of its use and discussion from antiquity to the present day, and critical analyses of the main attempts at its elucidation. Its purpose is nothing less than to lay the foundations for a new branch of logic, and greatly develop it; and thus to once and for all dispel the many fallacious ideas circulating regarding the nature of a fortiori reasoning.
From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild
This volume comprises a selection of contributions to the theorizing about argumentation that have been presented at the 9th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), held in Amsterdam in July 2018. The chapters included provide a general theoretical perspective on central topics in argumentation theory, such as argument schemes and the fallacies. Some contributions concentrate on the treatment of the concept of conductive argument. Other contributions are dedicated to specific issues such as the justification of questions, the occurrence of mining relations, the role of exclamatives, argumentative abduction, eudaimonistic argumentation and a typology of ...
Exposing Fake Logic
Exposing Fake Logic by Avi Sion is a collection of essays written after publication of his book A Fortiori Logic, in which he critically responds to derivative work by other authors who claim to know better. This is more than just polemics; but allows further clarifications of a fortiori logic and of general logic.
How Philosophers Argue
This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording. The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the pr...
Logique et analyse
None
Cultura científica y cultura tecnológica
El IV Congreso Iberoamericano de Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnología se celebró en la Universidad de Salamanca entre los días 3 y 7 de julio de 2017 y estuvo organizado por el Instituto de Estudios de la Ciencia y la Tecnología. El germen de estos congresos fue la «Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía» que precisamente ese año concluyó con la publicación del último volumen de los proyectados. En su origen destacan los nombres de dos filósofos claves que han sido especialmente relevantes en el Congreso: Miguel Ángel Quintanilla, en honor del que se eligió tanto la sede como la temática y León Olivé, que falleció pocos meses antes. Desde el Congreso se les rindió ho...
Argumentation in Actual Practice
Argumentation in Actual Practice contains a collection of topical studies about argumentative discourse in context written by argumentation scholars from a diversity of academic backgrounds. Some contributions provide general perspectives, other contributions deal with specific issues, particular types of argumentative discourse or individual argumentative speech events. The contexts in which argumentation is examined vary from politics and the media to medical, juridical, educational, commercial or military contexts, a specific academic discipline, a special issue or pertain to all kinds of contextualised argumentative discourse. The issues discussed include the interpretation and analysis of argumentation, strategic manoeuvring, argument schemes, the stock issues, the fallacies, the principle of charity and the persuasiveness of argumentative discourse. A common feature is that they are all empirically-oriented and that virtually all of them are strongly concerned with an adequate understanding of contextualised argumentative discourse and the factors that may increase or decrease its reasonableness and effectiveness.
Las culturas de la argumentación
Las prácticas de argumentar se construyen como comunicaciones entre dos o más animales humanos, o cuando un animal humano se desdobla y conversa consigo mismo. Esta forma de agencia que es argumentar consiste en intercambiar razones con el propósito de persuadir: de orientar la atención y condicionar y hasta determinar deseos, creencias, afectos, acciones. Pero con tal agencia no se trata de persuadir de cualquier modo; se busca convencer con razones. Se orientan y, si es posible, se determinan deseos, creencias, afectos y acciones respaldándolas en razones, y en esas articulaciones de razones que son los argumentos. Por eso, si no me equivoco, quien atiende esos artefactos, las razones y los argumentos en cuanto construcciones de una práctica humana adopta una perspectiva fecunda, con no pocas consecuencias. ¿Cuáles son éstas?
Salvador López Arnal, la humildad de un sabio
A través de la figura de Salvador López Arnal, el lector podrá comprender una parte de la intrahistoria del pensamiento crítico español de los últimos 50 años. Una manera de vivir el compromiso político-intelectual al margen de la oficialidad académica y cultural y de los medios de comunicación hegemónicos. Salvador López Arnal (Barcelona, 1954) es uno de los principales representantes de la tercera generación de lo que podríamos denominar la Escuela Marxista de Barcelona, o, siguiendo la expresión del Catedrático Francisco Vázquez, el “nódulo Sacristán”. Autor de más de 56 libros, 29 capítulos de libros y 100 artículos, dentro de su voluminosa producción intelectu...
