You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Its a Research Work on Confessional Poetry of Kamala Das and Eunice De Souza : A Comparative Study . Its shows the confessionalism in the poetry of Kamala Das and Eunice De Souza .
Indian English poetry is not addition of English poetry. It is essentially Indian because it portrays Indian cultural and linguistic unity. It is an outcome of Indian literature which has been written in various Indian languages. Therefore, Indian English poetry is one of the parts of Indian English Literature which depicts the socio-political, religious, domestic and economical picture of Indian people. Gauri Deshpande states: We are right in asserting that we are Indian poets writing in English. Our landscape is Indian, our thought is moulded by our political, social, economic and philosophic scene. (Chindhade, p.10). Indian English poetry has accomplished both richness and excellence of craftsmanship.
When I was student of English literature in M.A. final, it was an ambition in my mind to write a book on Kamala Das. After hard endeavor I am able to write this book. I am aware of the fact, there are a few books purported to be full length studies of Kamala Das’s poetry available and there are also scores of articles and papers on the various aspects of her poetry that have appeared in literary journals or included in books on Indian writing in English. But the sweep of such publications appear to be very limited. In another words their views about Kamala Das’s poetry seem truncated. In this connection, I would like to cite up a story of six blind men. They went to acknowledge the eleph...
None
None
Includes entries for maps and atlases.
“The Mahatma Misunderstood” studies the relationship between the production of novels in late-colonial India and nationalist agitation promoted by the Indian National Congress. The volume examines the process by which novelists who were critically engaged with Gandhian nationalism, and who saw both the potentials and the pitfalls of Gandhian political strategies, came to be seen as the Mahatma’s standard-bearers rather than his loyal opposition.