You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
General Charles James Napier was sent to confront the tens of thousands of Chartist protestors marching through the cities of the North of England in the late 1830s. A well-known leftist who agreed with the Chartist demands for democracy, Napier managed to keep the peace. In South Asia, the same man would later provoke a war and conquer Sind. In this first-ever scholarly biography of Napier, Edward Beasley asks how the conventional depictions of the man as a peacemaker in England and a warmonger in Asia can be reconciled. Employing deep archival research and close readings of Napier's published books (ignored by prior scholars), this well-written volume demonstrates that Napier was a liberal imperialist who believed that if freedom was right for the people of England it was right for the people of Sind -- even if "freedom" had to be imposed by military force. Napier also confronted the messy aftermath of Western conquest, carrying out nation-building with mixed success, trying to end the honour killing of women, and eventually discovering the limits of imperial interference.
List of members in v. 1-2, 9-10, 15-18.
None
During the first half of the nineteenth century the British quadrupled the size of their empire in South Asia. This break from pre-British to British South Asia resulted, in part, from superior arms, military organization and economic wealth. This process also relied on a liaison between knowledge and power: studying the lives and lands of would-be subjects usually pre-dated specific imperial expansions. To this end, Edward Patterson Del Hoste travelled to Sindh in 1831. A member of Henry Pottingers 1831-32 diplomatic mission to Hyderabad and Khyrpoor (now Khairpur), Del Hoste was a surveyor. He not only surveyed the villages and towns that the mission travelled through, but commented extens...
Excerpts from the works of European authors who visited Sind, now a province of Pakistan, during 18th-19th centuries.
This book provides readers with a vivid picture of how South Asians were perceived by many in Britain in the mid-nineteenth century, as well as of life in Sindh under the Amirs, rulers of the region at that time. McMurdo's description indicates the bias and prejudice of an imperialist viewpoint and the political ramifi cations of such perceptions. At the time of Charles Napier's conquest of Sindh in 1843, the British government launched an adverse propaganda campaign aimed at depicting the Amirs as being incapable of looking aft er their own territories. This account can be counted as a part of this campaign. The book refl ects the broad political canvas of that time and prepares the backdrop for the eventual conquest of Sindh.
Records publications acquired from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, by the U.S. Library of Congress Offices in New Delhi, India, and Karachi, Pakistan.