You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Philosophy is self-destruction. It is constantly destroying and rebuilding oneself. When we look at the philosophers, we can clearly observe this in their works. They constantly come to terms with the thoughts of other philosophers and their own thoughts. It is not possible for those who are not ready to destroy themselves, and those who cling to the truths they have created, in order to establish a connection with philosophy. They only think what they put forward under the inuence of the idea that they are stuck with –in connection with the truth, with their truthis philosophy. Maybe some of them can get into philosophy anyway. However, getting into philosophy is one thing, staying in it is another thing.
Philosophy was regarded as an activity in which language is used at the highest level with contemplation on relationship of humans with the world along with all these problems. On the other hand, life styles and cultures of people who came from other cities and language, which is carrier of all these things, in other words exchange of words, had the most important impact on transformations in urban life. An explanation can also be made on how thinking has been enriched by addressing dties as spaces where exchange of words is carried out and language gets enriched Development of language also affected and improved intellectual life. Thus, philosophical thought was born, developed on all historical heritage of humanity and became visible in the world of humanity as an activity of contemplation on this heritage. Philosophical thought is a heritage of city and urban life to humanity and also a humane heritage - it is a humane heritage of humanity for humans.
Philosophy, as a way of thinking that produces concepts, tries to understand and make sense of what is happening, life, the world, and is based on critical thinking and critical looking. In philosophy, criticism takes its power from reasoning, that is, from putting a principle and thinking and the work done with this reasoning. In this context, the philosopher's work is to look at life and the world with a critical eye, and to try to see and grasp what is happening and becoming in its entirety. Conceptual thinking thus goes with criticism. At this point, it is necessary to separe a place for language -for language as the language of philosophy. Philosophy is thinking with language, in language and through language. This language is also the language of man; the language that man speaks in existence, and in Being. In this sense, there is no special language of philosophy, language of religion, language of science and language of art. Where there is thinking and speaking, there is only "man’s language"
Foucault states that a result of the development of bio-power is an importancegained by norm g ame at the expense of legal law system norm. Accordingly, law does not remain unarmed and the most suitable gun is death; it responds to the ones opposing to itself with this absolute threat at least in the final stage The law is always thought with holy justice. However, a power that undertakes life responsibility will always need regulatory and corrective mechanisms. Here, not bring forward the death in the field of sovereignty, but delivering life in the field of value and usefulness is in question. Foucault wants to state that the law is running in the form of norm more day by day and the functions of justice institution is integrating especially with a medical, administrative etc. devices universe that is regulatory a lot more gradually.
ANATOLIA ULUSLARARASI SOSYAL BİLİMLER BİLİMSEL ARAŞTIRMALAR KONGRESİ BİLDİRİ KİTABI – (6-8 EKİM 2023)
IHLAMUR DERGİSİ Sayı 30
“Kendi hakkında susmak daha iyidir.” sözüne tüm varlığımla inansam da bazen inandığım şeyin aksine kendimi ifade etmekten alıkoyamıyorum, şimdi o “an”lardan biri ve kendim hakkında susamıyorum. Felsefi bir araştırma yapma sürecim, Gadamer’in Hakikat ve Yöntem adlı kitabını yöntemsiz bir şekilde, kitabın ortasından okumamla başladı. Bu kitapta “tecrübe” bahsini okurken “tecrübenin hakikati”yle aniden karşılaştım ve bir şiirden etkilenir gibi etkilendim. O gün Gadamer’in “tecrübe” anlayışını çalışmaya karar verdim. “Tecrübe”nin öngörülemez, tekrarlanamaz, unutulamaz, anlamı anlatmakla tüketilemez ve kendisinden baş...
Although Kierkegaard's reception was initially more or less limited to Scandinavia, it has for a long time now been a highly international affair. As his writings became translated into the different languages, his reputation spread, and he became read more and more by people increasingly distant from his native Denmark. While in Scandinavia, the attack on the Church in the last years of his life became something of a cause célèbre, later many different aspects of his work became the object of serious scholarly investigation well beyond the original northern borders. As his reputation grew, he was co-opted by a number of different philosophical and religious movements in different contexts...
None