You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Papers arising out of St. George's position as Garter King-of-Arms, including notices sent to the Gazette of those elected and installed as knights of the Garter and notes relating to these ceremonies and their expenses, in addition to a receipt and correspondence, particularly from 1702 to 1703. Attached on p. 8 are the coats of arms of Queen Anne and Prince George.
Autograph manuscript lists the gentry, bailiffs, lay and clerical officials and justices of the peace, and cites the sources for the family pedigrees, especially the monumental inscriptions. Many coats of arms in trick. St. George's name appears on p. 12.
(1) Detailing 8 conditions of his appointment as painter of arms for the county of Devon and city of Exeter; signed by Pike, including his seal, and 3 witnesses. (2) a copy of Pike's appointment originally signed by Henry St. George, Clarenceux King of Arms.
Contains 9 autograph drafts and copies of signed and unsigned letters. Correspondents include: Gilbert Burnet, bishop of Salisbury, the Earl of Carlisle, Dr. Hascard, Dean of Windsor, Gregory King, [Francis Negus?] and the [Earl of Suffolk].
This fascinating genealogical record provides a detailed account of the heraldic visitations to London in the early 17th century. Compiled by Sir Henry St. George, Richmond Herald, and deputy to Sir Richard St. George, Clarencieux King of Arms, it includes pedigrees and coats of arms of hundreds of families in the area. It is an essential resource for historians, genealogists, and anyone interested in the fascinating world of heraldry. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the "public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.