Welcome to our book review site go-pdf.online!
You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Auschwitz
Auschwitz is the epicenter of the Holocaust. There is no place on earth where more people are said to have been murdered than at Auschwitz. At this detention camp the industrialized mass murder of the Jews by Nazi Germany reached its demonic pinnacle. This narrative is based on a wide range of evidence, the most important of which was presented during two trials whose findings form the foundation of our present image of Auschwitz: the International Military Tribunal of 1945-1946 in Nuremberg, Germany, and the German Auschwitz Trial of 1963-1965 in Frankfurt. When we dig deeper into the rulings of these trials and the actual evidence they are based upon, however, the story looks quite differe...
The Auschwitz Myth
None
Der Auschwitz-Mythos
Der promovierte Jurist Wilhelm Staglich hat als erster und bisher einziger sachverstandiger Rechtsgelehrte die Nurnberger Tribunale und den Frankfurter Auschwitz-Prozess einer kritisch-juristischen Analyse unterzogen. Seine Ergebnisse verschlagen dem Leser ein ums andere Mal den Atem angesichts der unvorstellbar skandalosen Art, mit der die alliierte Siegerjustiz und die bundesdeutschen Strafbehorden das Recht beugten und brachen, um zu politisch vorgegebenen Ergebnissen zu kommen. Dies ist wahrlich ein Augenoffner fur all jene, die meinen, der Holocaust sei doch in etlichen rechtstaatlichen Strafverfahren hieb- und stichfest nachgewiesen worden. Da das Buch einen ungeheuren Erfolg hatte und...
Partners in Hate
Discusses Chomsky's views on Zionism, Israel, and the Holocaust, as well as his relations with Holocaust revisionists in France and the USA (both extreme right and extreme left), and in particular with Faurisson. Chomsky has always justified his stance as a defense of freedom of speech. At the same time, he did not refrain from expressing his views in neo-Nazi and other radical publications. This fact, as well as an examination of his pronouncements and arguments, shows that antisemitism underlies his views. Examines the leftist, neo-Trotskyist intellectual tradition (the Marlenites, who, inter alia, claimed that the Nazis were not more criminal than the Allies), which influenced Chomsky's views on the Holocaust and Zionism, and recently found expression in the views of the leftist group and publishing house La Vieille Taupe. Compares the views of Holocaust deniers with those of the Marlenites and the post-Zionist and pro-Palestinian historians: if the latter groups had no malicious anti-Jewish intentions in their writings, Chomsky and Faurisson had. This edition includes a preface dealing, in particular, with the activities of Chomsky and his "accomplices" after 1988.
Der Auschwitz-Mythos
None
Der Auschwitz-Mythos
None
The Case for Auschwitz
From January to April 2000 historian David Irving brought a high-profile libel case against Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt in the British High Court, charging that Lipstadt's book, Denying the Holocaust (1993), falsely labeled him a Holocaust denier. The question about the evidence for Auschwitz as a death camp played a central role in these proceedings. Irving had based his alleged denial of the Holocaust in part on a 1988 report by an American execution specialist, Fred Leuchter, which claimed that there was no evidence for homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. In connection with their defense, Penguin and Lipstadt engaged architectural historian Robert Jan van Pelt to present evidence for our knowledge that Auschwitz had been an extermination camp where up to one million Jews were killed, mainly in gas chambers. Employing painstaking historical scholarship, van Pelt prepared and submitted an exhaustive forensic report that he successfully defended in cross-examination in court.
