You may have to Search all our reviewed books and magazines, click the sign up button below to create a free account.
Oğuz Ünal çarpıcı bir üslupla, ilk olarak İslam Devleti hizmetinde ve Hilafet sancağı altında “Biladü’r-Rum”a (Roma ülkesine yani Anadolu’ya) cihada gelen Türklerin, ardından 11. yüzyıldan itibaren, coşkun bir fetih ruhu ve gaza ideolojisiyle, bu topraklarda yurt tutma, yeni bir vatan ve devlet kurma heyecanı taşıyan, “ya devlet başa ya kuzgun leşe” diyerek “Güneş Ülkesi” Horasan’dan “Güneşin Doğduğu Yer” Anadolu’ya dalgalar halinde akan Oğuz (Türkmen) boylarının, Selçuklu Sultanlarının sevk ve idaresinde ve Selçuklu ordularının öncülüğünde, bugün üzerinde yaşadığımız toprakları kanları ile yoğuruşu ve bu topraklar üzerinde dünya durdukça yaşayacak olan yeni bir Türk Devleti’nin, Orhun Kitabeleri’ndeki söylenişi ile “Bengü Devlet”in, Osmanlı atalarımızın deyişiyle “Devlet-i Ebed Müddet”in kuruluşunu belgelere dayanarak anlatıyor. [Ötüken Neşriyat]
For a time it was almost a cliche to say that anthropology was a handmaiden of colonialism - by which was usually meant 'Western' colonialism. And this insinuation was assumed to somehow weaken the theoretical claims of anthropology and its fieldwork achievements. What this collection demonstrates is that colonialism was not only a Western phenomenon, but 'Eastern' as well. And that Japanese or Chinese anthropologists were also engaged in studying subject peoples. But wherever they were and whoever they were anthropologists always had a complex and problematic relationship with the colonial state. The latter saw some anthropologists' sympathy for 'the natives' as a threat, while on the other hand anthropological knowledge was used for the training of colonial officials. The impact of the colonial situation on the formation of anthropological theories is an important if not easily answered question, and the comparison of experiences in Asia offered in this book further helps to illuminate this complex relationship.
Here, the author examines Russian thinking about the Orient before the Revolution of 1917. He argues that the Russian Empire's bi-continental geography and the complicated nature of its encounter with Asia have all resulted in a variegated understanding of the East among its people.
This biographical dictionary provides information on 322 men and women who have made or are making significant contributions in the field of anthropology. A short biography highlights each person's professional and private background and detailed analysis of the theories or approaches that each contributed to his or her individual field and a guide to their major published works are provided. A chronological appendix lists each person's date of birth, full name, and primary field of study, guiding readers to entries covering 1681 to 2006. An extensive glossary explains technical terms used throughout the work.
None